Misdiagnosis of Milk Sample Cultures

The infection status of mammary quarters is determined by microbiological culture of aseptically obtained milk samples and interpretation of the culture results. As in all biological data, diagnosing intramammary infection is subject to error.

Culture of milk samples generally results in one of three events:

1) no bacterial growth
2) growth of a pure culture
3) growth of multiple colony types

Any of the three outcomes may not represent the true infection status of the quarter. Therefore, strict adherence to aseptic sampling technique and proper storage and handling of milk samples are absolutely essential. In addition, diagnosis of intramammary infection status based on multiple samples is more reliable than diagnosis based on a single sample.

False-positive Samples
False-positive samples [F(+)] result when a pathogen is isolated in pure culture but the quarter is truly not infected. Such samples occur as a result of contamination at some point during sample collection and/or processing. When intramammary infection status is based on culture of a single sample, F(+) samples get interpreted as an infected quarter.

A frequent assumption is that the recovery of the contagious pathogens Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus agalactiae from a single milk sample is evidence of intramammary infection. However, F(+) samples can occur with all pathogens including Staph. aureus and Strep. agalactiae, and the frequency of F(+) samples will increase as the number of truly infected quarters in a herd increases. False-positive samples associated with the environmental pathogens likely will increase as environmental contamination increases.

False-negative Samples
False-negative samples [F(-)] result when no microbial growth is detected following microbiological culture but the quarter is truly infected. Reasons for such samples include:

1) the colony-forming units of the organism in the milk are below the detection limit of the assay
2) special media or growth conditions are required
3) inhibitors in the milk sample, such as antibiotics, have interfered with the growth of the pathogen
4) the sample was mishandled during storage, resulting in death of the pathogen.

False-negative samples are more likely to occur with coliform and Staph. aureus infections than infections caused by Strep. agalactiae.

Attempts to reduce the number of F(-) samples by using enrichment techniques or a period of preliminary incubation should be avoided. Plating larger volumes of milk (0.1 ml per half-plate) will help reduce the number of F(-) samples but may increase the number of contaminated samples if aseptic sampling technique is poor. Clinical quarters are generally assumed to be infected.

A common finding is that 20-30% of samples from clinical quarters will result in no microbial growth. Clinical signs may be present but the pathogen has been eliminated by the cow’s immune system.

Contaminated Samples
When a quarter milk sample results in the culture of three or more dissimilar colony types, the milk sample is most likely contaminated and the sample should be recorded as such. All mastitis pathogens present in milk samples can be a result of contamination, including Staph. aureus and Strep. agalactiae.

Two degrees of contamination are generally recognized:

The first is "low level" contamination in which dissimilar colonies are present. These may be the only colonies on the streak or they may be present in the streak of an otherwise pure culture of a pathogen. The "low level" contamination should be recorded together with the pathogen.

The second type of contamination is "gross contamination". Three or more colony types are present on the milk streak, often in relatively heavy growth. Such samples should be declared contaminated and no attempt should be made to identify potential pathogens within the mix of microbial growth. When gross contamination is observed, the quarter should be resampled.

Common contamination sources include dirty teat ends, milk touching fingers before entering the tube, nonsterile tubes or inoculating needles, streaking milk samples on contaminated media, excess alcohol on teats or hands, contaminated cotton swab container, and the container lid not sealed tightly resulting in alcohol evaporation from cotton swabs.

Source: National Mastitis Council publication "Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis" (1999) p. 35


NMC home