![]() |
|
The infection status of mammary quarters is determined by microbiological
culture of aseptically obtained milk samples and interpretation of the
culture results. As in all biological data, diagnosing intramammary
infection is subject to error. Culture of milk samples generally results in one of three events: A frequent assumption is that the recovery of the contagious pathogens
Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus agalactiae from
a single milk sample is evidence of intramammary infection. However,
F(+) samples can occur with all pathogens including Staph. aureus
and Strep. agalactiae, and the frequency of F(+) samples will
increase as the number of truly infected quarters in a herd increases.
False-positive samples associated with the environmental pathogens likely
will increase as environmental contamination increases. Attempts to reduce the number of F(-) samples by using enrichment techniques
or a period of preliminary incubation should be avoided. Plating larger
volumes of milk (0.1 ml per half-plate) will help reduce the number
of F(-) samples but may increase the number of contaminated samples
if aseptic sampling technique is poor. Clinical quarters are generally
assumed to be infected. Two degrees of contamination are generally recognized: The second type of contamination is "gross contamination".
Three or more colony types are present on the milk streak, often in
relatively heavy growth. Such samples should be declared contaminated
and no attempt should be made to identify potential pathogens within
the mix of microbial growth. When gross contamination is observed, the
quarter should be resampled. Common contamination sources include dirty teat ends, milk touching
fingers before entering the tube, nonsterile tubes or inoculating needles,
streaking milk samples on contaminated media, excess alcohol on teats
or hands, contaminated cotton swab container, and the container lid
not sealed tightly resulting in alcohol evaporation from cotton swabs. Source: National Mastitis Council publication "Laboratory Handbook
on Bovine Mastitis" (1999) p. 35 |